<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fantalytics: Best 2009 Keeper</title>
	<link>http://waiversharks.com/blog/2009/01/28/fantalytics-best-2009-keeper/</link>
	<description>Expert advice on baseball players - Sleepers &#38; Keepers for your Major League Baseball- fantasy sports waiver wire.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 23:26:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://waiversharks.com/blog/2009/01/28/fantalytics-best-2009-keeper/#comment-2158</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 07:30:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://waiversharks.com/blog/2009/01/28/fantalytics-best-2009-keeper/#comment-2158</guid>
		<description>You're probably correct in your assumption "I Strike". 

Adam caught the first plane out of Detroit to Las Vegas yesterday, and so I will have to ask him how low he thinks Johnson's ERA will actually sink to in 2009 upon his return. 

Either way, I think he's a player still hovering under many fantasy radars due to the lack of attention Marlins not named Hanley seem to garner!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re probably correct in your assumption &#8220;I Strike&#8221;. </p>
<p>Adam caught the first plane out of Detroit to Las Vegas yesterday, and so I will have to ask him how low he thinks Johnson&#8217;s ERA will actually sink to in 2009 upon his return. </p>
<p>Either way, I think he&#8217;s a player still hovering under many fantasy radars due to the lack of attention Marlins not named Hanley seem to garner!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://waiversharks.com/blog/2009/01/28/fantalytics-best-2009-keeper/#comment-2156</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 19:37:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://waiversharks.com/blog/2009/01/28/fantalytics-best-2009-keeper/#comment-2156</guid>
		<description>Well put, I Strike.  Thanks for your comment!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well put, I Strike.  Thanks for your comment!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: I Strike</title>
		<link>http://waiversharks.com/blog/2009/01/28/fantalytics-best-2009-keeper/#comment-2154</link>
		<dc:creator>I Strike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 14:53:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://waiversharks.com/blog/2009/01/28/fantalytics-best-2009-keeper/#comment-2154</guid>
		<description>I think you meant JJ will have a respectable sub 4.00 ERA. But if he does go sub 3.00 I'll tell everyone I know that Adam Forsyth nailed it on the head. It won't take long, as I don't know that many people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you meant JJ will have a respectable sub 4.00 ERA. But if he does go sub 3.00 I&#8217;ll tell everyone I know that Adam Forsyth nailed it on the head. It won&#8217;t take long, as I don&#8217;t know that many people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WaiverSharks Webmaster</title>
		<link>http://waiversharks.com/blog/2009/01/28/fantalytics-best-2009-keeper/#comment-2153</link>
		<dc:creator>WaiverSharks Webmaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 20:17:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://waiversharks.com/blog/2009/01/28/fantalytics-best-2009-keeper/#comment-2153</guid>
		<description>Thanks Yankees 2012.  Thankfully readers like you are paying attention.  The Final call was accidentally omitted when posting the finished copy.  Sorry for the confusion!

Rest assured, Fantalytics will ALWAYS have a Final call!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Yankees 2012.  Thankfully readers like you are paying attention.  The Final call was accidentally omitted when posting the finished copy.  Sorry for the confusion!</p>
<p>Rest assured, Fantalytics will ALWAYS have a Final call!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yankees 2012</title>
		<link>http://waiversharks.com/blog/2009/01/28/fantalytics-best-2009-keeper/#comment-2152</link>
		<dc:creator>Yankees 2012</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 19:03:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://waiversharks.com/blog/2009/01/28/fantalytics-best-2009-keeper/#comment-2152</guid>
		<description>I dont get it.  I thought this was Johnson vs Morrow.  But you say both are good.  You didnt pick which one you would rather have.  Im not sure what the point was?  To tell us that both Johnson and Morrow are sleepers?  Um, I think we already know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dont get it.  I thought this was Johnson vs Morrow.  But you say both are good.  You didnt pick which one you would rather have.  Im not sure what the point was?  To tell us that both Johnson and Morrow are sleepers?  Um, I think we already know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

